Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Refactoring lock.c

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactoring lock.c
Date: 2005-02-03 00:00:08
Message-ID: 1107388808.26960.31.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:41 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> There's two almost identical pieces of code in LockRelease and 
> LockReleaseAll that do the opposite of GrantLock.
> 
> Here's a small patch that replaces those pieces with a static UnGrantLock 
> function.

LockReleaseAll() did not update the holdMask bits for a released
proclock, but it will do so now. That's okay because we're removing the
proclock, right?

Barring any objections, I'll apply this to HEAD today or tomorrow.

-Neil



In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-02-03 03:16:10
Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-02-02 23:53:08
Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group