Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: benchmarks with pgbench

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: "Kavan, Dan (IMS)" <KavanD(at)imsweb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmarks with pgbench
Date: 2005-01-24 19:33:28
Message-ID: 1106595208.16640.112.camel@state.g2switchworks.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 13:19, Kavan, Dan (IMS) wrote:
> I hate to admit this publically, but I've been reading my results
> backwards.
> 
> I was getting 100 tps on Solaris - postgres 64 bit and 300 tps on SUSE
> postgres both x86-64.
> So, 300 is better than 100 right?  I was reading it backwards.
> I was thinking 300 was the actual speed to process a certain amount of
> transactions, but actually the x86-64 system is performing better than
> all, not worse.  
> 
> ~Dj
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, they are both running on the same hardware - NAS.

Yep, 300 is better than 100.  Glad to hear it.

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Inpreet SinghDate: 2005-01-25 04:56:25
Subject: Restore postgres database problem
Previous:From: Kavan, Dan (IMS)Date: 2005-01-24 19:19:18
Subject: Re: benchmarks with pgbench

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group