Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison
Date: 1999-08-07 03:36:10
Message-ID: 11024.933996970@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> This same problem was reported for HPUX a couple weeks ago (see thread
>> "[PORTS] HP-UX port" on 29 July). I think that moving the #include of
>> "pl_scan.c" down to the file trailer section, instead of having it in
>> the file header, would work. Did not try it yet.

> Moving the #include down below the %} does not work. Is there another
> section. I put it on line 49.

No, that'd be in the grammar proper. I meant down in the trailing
miscellaneous-C-code section, say right after the %% divider at line
1081. (If I were a yacc expert I'd know the names of these sections,
but I'm just a hacker...)

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-07 04:24:19 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison
Previous Message lamar.owen 1999-08-07 01:53:47 Re: [PORTS] Release 2 testing RPMS -- includes ALPHA patches.