Re: [pgsql-www] Corporate Contributors WAS:

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Corporate Contributors WAS:
Date: 2004-12-03 19:31:01
Message-ID: 1102102261.2441.338.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 13:29, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >>An example is Practical PostgreSQL. That book has been
> >>online since the day it hit shelves, free for anyone to use.
> >>But it isn't the same as say donating patches to ECPG or
> >>PlPerl which gets directly injected into the community.
> >>Practical PostgreSQL is a community resource, but it is
> >>not community sponsored.
> >
> >
> > On the other hand, PL/PHP is considered a "contribution" even though it is
> > hosted at CMD's site.
>
> Well that brings up another paradigm of course, which would be
> popularity. If I recall, plPHP was actually considered to be put into
> core but it can't be because it was a circular dependency.
>
> (You have to have the PHP source to make plPHP, that is not the case
> with plPerl or plPython).
>

I think (hope) eventually it will become a project up on pgfoundry,
built using the pgxs tech, living a lot like plr.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jussi Mikkola 2004-12-03 19:37:04 Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-12-03 19:30:24 Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-12-03 23:56:50 Mirror.php
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-12-03 19:24:14 Re: Links for press page ... where will these things be?