Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

From: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net>
To: "Tom Copeland" <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date: 2004-11-24 17:52:05
Message-ID: 1101318725.12988.5.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:32, Tom Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> > What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL 
> > Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is 
> > linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you 
> > will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
> > 
> > Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would 
> > fix it.
> 
> There's a PostgreSQL forum up now:
> 
> http://forums.databasejournal.com/forumdisplay.php?s=53f8cab16be0ade340079ed45a58c270&forumid=2

But at the bottom of the article, when you click on the "PostgreSQL
forum" you still get the MSSQL forum.

The poor little PostgreSQL forum there is dying from lack of attention,
with only two posts total ever...


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-11-25 16:09:09
Subject: Happy Thanksgiving
Previous:From: Tom CopelandDate: 2004-11-24 17:44:35
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group