On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL
> Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is
> linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you
> will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
> Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would
> fix it.
There's a PostgreSQL forum up now:
Thanks for the suggestion,
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Tom Copeland||Date: 2004-11-24 14:35:23|
|Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?|
|Previous:||From: Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz]||Date: 2004-11-24 14:30:25|
|Subject: Re: Anyone willing to chat to someone as a postgresql reference?|