Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

From: Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date: 2004-11-24 14:32:20
Message-ID: 1101306740.8976.1.camel@hal (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL 
> Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is 
> linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you 
> will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
> 
> Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would 
> fix it.

There's a PostgreSQL forum up now:

http://forums.databasejournal.com/forumdisplay.php?s=53f8cab16be0ade340079ed45a58c270&forumid=2

Thanks for the suggestion,

Tom


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom CopelandDate: 2004-11-24 14:35:23
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Previous:From: Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz]Date: 2004-11-24 14:30:25
Subject: Re: Anyone willing to chat to someone as a postgresql reference?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group