| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions |
| Date: | 2004-11-23 23:23:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1101252170.2948.174.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 23:08, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > as per SQL:2003 Annex E pp.1173-1175 "Incompatibilities with
> > SQL:1999", specifically point 17, pp.1174-1175:
> >
> > "A number of additional <reserved word>s have been added to the
> > language".
>
> I think you are confusing keywords.c with the SQL standard.
Hmmm... the difference was clear to me, since I edited one, but not the
other. ;)
If you are saying "we should not support the SQL standard with regard to
the new reserved words added in SQL:2003", I would understand, but not
agree.
With you lies the power to apply, all some or none of the patch, as you
choose. It was tedious enough to write the patch...
--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-11-23 23:23:51 | Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-23 23:22:29 | Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions |