Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions
Date: 2004-11-23 23:23:09
Message-ID: 1101252170.2948.174.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 23:08, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > as per SQL:2003 Annex E pp.1173-1175 "Incompatibilities with
> > SQL:1999", specifically point 17, pp.1174-1175:
> >
> > "A number of additional <reserved word>s have been added to the
> > language".
> 
> I think you are confusing keywords.c with the SQL standard.

Hmmm... the difference was clear to me, since I edited one, but not the
other. ;)

If you are saying "we should not support the SQL standard with regard to
the new reserved words added in SQL:2003", I would understand, but not
agree.

With you lies the power to apply, all some or none of the patch, as you
choose. It was tedious enough to write the patch...

-- 
Best Regards, Simon Riggs


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-11-23 23:23:51
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-23 23:22:29
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group