Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions
Date: 2004-11-23 23:23:09
Message-ID: 1101252170.2948.174.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 23:08, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > as per SQL:2003 Annex E pp.1173-1175 "Incompatibilities with
> > SQL:1999", specifically point 17, pp.1174-1175:
> >
> > "A number of additional <reserved word>s have been added to the
> > language".
> I think you are confusing keywords.c with the SQL standard.

Hmmm... the difference was clear to me, since I edited one, but not the
other. ;)

If you are saying "we should not support the SQL standard with regard to
the new reserved words added in SQL:2003", I would understand, but not

With you lies the power to apply, all some or none of the patch, as you
choose. It was tedious enough to write the patch...

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-11-23 23:23:51
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-23 23:22:29
Subject: Re: SQL:2003 keyword additions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group