Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

From: Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date: 2004-11-23 18:51:22
Message-ID: 1101235882.20680.193.camel@hal (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 13:40, Michael Paesold wrote:
> Tom Copeland wrote:
> 
> > This article is up here now:
> >
> > http://databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3437821
> >
> > Thanks to Merlin Moncure and Robert Bernier for their helpful
> > suggestions, and long live PostgreSQL!
> What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL 
> Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is 
> linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you 
> will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).
> 
> Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would 
> fix it.

Good catch, I've dropped them a line, thanks!

> I liked your article.

Thanks!

Yours,

Tom


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-11-24 04:39:46
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Previous:From: Michael PaesoldDate: 2004-11-23 18:40:31
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group