Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics

From: John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics
Date: 2005-02-24 19:19:55
Message-ID: 10EF1C42-8699-11D9-9C17-000A95B03262@pgedit.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
Hi Magnus,

On Feb 24, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> I did some simple pivoting in Excel and split it into categories win32,
> source, sig (MD5 or PGP signatures), RPMs, split (the split tarballs),
> pgadmin and ODBC. Other stuff was so little that I cut it.


Assuming this is from a HTTP log, I'm just curious if you took into 
account that many Windows users have "download managers" that make 
repeated requests to get a single file. You see this in the log with a 
206 (partial content) HTTP response code. So you might have anywhere 
from 10 to 20 hits in the log to download a single file. This makes it 
a pain to get accurate download statistics.


John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Troels ArvinDate: 2005-02-24 20:11:54
Subject: Re: Some download statistics
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-02-24 17:28:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Troels ArvinDate: 2005-02-24 20:11:54
Subject: Re: Some download statistics
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2005-02-24 19:18:43
Subject: [Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@xeocode.com>] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group