Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>,PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-29 16:34:29
Message-ID: 1099067668.2634.2.camel@teetnang (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
В Птн, 29.10.2004, в 09:52, Dave Page пишет:

> Which is why we investigated CMSs in depths before we started, and found
> that even advanced ones such as Bricolage couldn't meet our requirements
> :-(.

In view of the fact that the current site does (probably) not only not
meet your requirements, but also doesn't meet the perceived needs of the
web site's users, wouldn't it be wise to adjust your requirements so
that bricolage or plone or whatever fit, in order to get something
going?

Thanks

-- 
Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2004-10-29 16:50:46
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-10-29 09:40:45
Subject: Re: perceived absence of work on website

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2004-10-29 16:50:46
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-10-29 09:40:45
Subject: Re: perceived absence of work on website

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group