On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 07:35, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Is there any reason that we don't have pg_functions, pg_users, pg_groups and
> other system views? pg_tables and pg_views is really useful, but it would
> be good to cover the other items as well.
pg_functions might be useful, but what would pg_users offer that pg_user
does not already do?
A pg_sequences view might also be handy.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2004-10-29 01:32:32|
|Subject: Re: pg_get_serial_sequence is inconsistent|
|Previous:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2004-10-29 00:57:12|
|Subject: Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items|