Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup
Date: 2005-12-26 18:44:15
Message-ID: 10947.1135622655@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous
> Backup".

This doesn't seem like an improvement.  "Online backup" is the standard
terminology AFAIK.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-26 18:46:38
Subject: Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-26 17:55:05
Subject: Online backup vs Continuous backup

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-26 18:46:38
Subject: Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup
Previous:From: Karel ZakDate: 2005-12-26 18:26:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] to_char and i18n

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-26 18:46:38
Subject: Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup
Previous:From: Karel ZakDate: 2005-12-26 18:26:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] to_char and i18n

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group