Re: 8.0 Open Items

From: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.0 Open Items
Date: 2004-08-21 19:18:55
Message-ID: 1093115935.2058.486.camel@jeff
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 11:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
<snip>
> > No, not at all. A nonfunctional catalog entry gets in the way of the
> > user replacing the function, should he wish to do that.
>
> Yea, but I would call the odds of that "pretty negligible".

What if they're trying to restore backwards compatibility by adding the
function?

Regards,
Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 姜维 2004-08-22 01:39:07 server crash in very big transaction [postgresql 8.0beta1]
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-21 18:26:32 Re: 8.0 Open Items