Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> Do references to the CVS need removing now that everything is on GIT?
The chapter about CVS obviously needs to be replaced. I was talking
to Magnus about that earlier, and we both felt that that needs to be
back-patched, if only so that there are non-obsolete repository URLs
in the next back-branch updates. I'm not sure that we need the
tutorial-ish description of how to do checkouts etc, but at the least
we need the URLs.
A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-09-22 12:05:26|
|Subject: Re: CVS in docs|
|Previous:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2010-09-21 22:11:12|
|Subject: CVS in docs|