| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |
| Date: | 2004-07-12 23:25:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1089674731.15640.150.camel@camel |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 16:35, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > that he "Used Daniel's Elephant", which I believe refers to Daniel
> > Lundin, though I don't recognize that name. Note also that that page
> > indicates that those logo's are for the community, not the corporation,
> > which in essence would mean that the company has posted that the logo is
> > for the community.
>
> I think the real problem is that while the community elephant and the
> postgresql, inc. elephant is the same, there is a unintended endorsement
> by the community to postgresql, inc.
>
> This is by no means a slam on postgresql, inc but it seems the community
> has always tried to be very business neutral and per Marc's own email
> the elephants should be different.
>
For the record pgsql.inc isnt the only company using the logo, they're
just more prominent about it than others.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-07-12 23:47:07 | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-12 21:59:20 | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |