Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: getXXX methods

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>,"pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getXXX methods
Date: 2004-07-09 15:45:24
Message-ID: 1089387924.1506.287.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Well, I have an interesting problem...

Detecting that a value is greater than MaxLong?

If I parse it using Double.parseDouble, and it is greater than LongMax
by 1 or so, the value ends up actually being less due to rounding ?

Any suggestions?

Dave
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 08:11, Dave Cramer wrote:
> I think that since the SQL spec is referenced at the end of the JDBC
> spec that it has some relevance. I just thought that in absence of a
> second, or third opinion this would suggest a course of action?
> 
> Dave
> On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 02:50, Kris Jurka wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > 
> > > Ok, it appears (at least from my understanding) that Kris is correct
> > > here.
> > > 
> > > I had a look at the sql2003 proposed spec (ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003(E)), and
> > > it states:
> > 
> > Well the SQL spec and the JDBC spec are different things.  I was basing 
> > part of my argument on the SQL spec's logic and extending that to fill in 
> > the holes in the JDBC spec, but I don't consider this definitive.  I still 
> > feel this is the right thing to do, but I don't want to close off the 
> > discussion if people feel otherwise.
> > 
> > Kris Jurka
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
-- 
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561


In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Rein ReezigtDate: 2004-07-09 16:03:22
Subject: unsuscribe
Previous:From: Bill ChandlerDate: 2004-07-09 15:18:48
Subject: Re: Terrible performance after deleting/recreating indexes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group