Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Donnacha Mac Gloinn <postgresql(dot)org(at)donnacha(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:
Date: 2004-06-22 22:41:39
Message-ID: 1087944098.86545.116.camel@jester (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
> Financially, vB are riding high at the moment, have the best product in
> their field and don't feel under any immediate pressure to pursue the
> long-term advantages that PostgreSQL could offer.  That's understandable
> but frustrating for those of us who are thinking ahead, which is why I
> wrote the following response:

Funnily enough, lack of PostgreSQL support is the reason why we chose to
go with another BB software rather than vB. Maintenance of a MySQL
installation just for the BB software wasn't worth it.

So, whether they want to acknowledge it or not, they're not the best
product in their field for some.



In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Donnacha Mac GloinnDate: 2004-06-22 22:45:47
Subject: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-06-22 22:07:58
Subject: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group