Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> CREATE FUNCTION sum_n_product(x int, y int, OUT sum int, OUT prod int) AS $$
>> BEGIN
>> sum := x + y;
>> prod := x * y;
>> RETURN;
>> END;
>> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

> The above code example do not have any RETURNS clause, does that mean that 
> it defaults to RETURNS void?

No, it effectively "RETURNS record", where the particular record type is
implied by the set of output parameters.  See my previous proposal.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? at 2005-04-05 07:04:30 from Dennis Bjorklund

Responses

• Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? at 2005-04-05 13:01:19 from Robert Treat

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Terry Yapt	Date: 2005-04-05 07:51:05
	Subject: Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?
Previous:	From: Dennis Bjorklund	Date: 2005-04-05 07:04:30
	Subject: Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?