Just added the check to make sure the type is not in pg_catalog schema.
Dave
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 18:32, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Other than the hack of what do with undefined types, and one more little
> problem which is how to qualify user defined types. This is more
> difficult than first glance. It is possible to just say typowner != 1,
> but this doesn't solve the problem if I own the cluster.
>
> Here is round 2
> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 08:18, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 20:20, Kris Jurka wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 May 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > >
> > > > While we don't support JAVA_OBJECT we do support struct, and distinct.
> > >
> > > After doing some more reading I would agree that domains == distinct and
> > > complext types == struct, if that's what you're suggesting. The patch
> > > shows no signs of this though, it just blindly selects everything out of
> > > pg_type.
> >
> > Yes
> > >
> > > To be worthy of applying it seems this patch should:
> > >
> > > 1) Only return domains and complex types, correctly setting data_type and
> > > base_type for domains.
> > >
> > > 2) Use pg_description to retrieve a comment for the remarks column.
> > >
> > > 3) Filter out toast entries by checking pg_namespace.nspname != 'pg_toast'
> > > instead of using a like expression on type name.
> >
> > this must remain, as there will be numerous pg_toast_... entries created
> > by large columns
> > >
> > > 4) Use the escapeQuotes function to ensure that the schema and type
> > > patterns don't have single quotes in them.
> > >
> > > 5) Use the types[] parameter to filter out undesired data_type values.
> > >
> > > 6) Use ORDER BY to return the results in the order the spec says.
> > >
> > > 7) Use createMetaDataStatement() instead of createStatement() when
> > > returning the query results. This makes the produced ResultSet scrollable
> > > instead of the default forward only behavior.
> > >
> > > I would personally like to see a version of this that ran on a 7.2 server
> > > because the regression tests currently pass against a 7.2 server. It
> > > isn't within our stated goals of supporting the past two versions of the
> > > driver, but I think it's a reasonable thing to do.
> >
> > This probably makes things alot more difficult as schema's don't exist
> > in 7.2 but...
> > >
> > > Kris Jurka
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561