| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Cédric_Coulon <cedric(dot)coulon(at)lina(dot)univ-nantes(dot)fr>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Retrieve the postgres transaction id |
| Date: | 2004-05-12 02:33:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1084329210.1534.145.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
That won't be true soon, nested transactions are coming ...
Just a heads up.
Dave
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 19:39, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Cédric Coulon wrote:
> > Thx for yours helps.
> > But Isn't there a possibility that a backend has more than one
> > transaction with locks?
>
> As I understand it, no. There is exactly one connection per backend, and
> one transaction per connection, and there is no way to change the
> transaction associated with a connection without committing/aborting the
> existing transaction.
>
> -O
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:40a167fc177361515062736!
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wall | 2004-05-12 03:07:12 | Re: JDBC and processing large numbers of rows |
| Previous Message | Sean Shanny | 2004-05-12 01:29:06 | Re: JDBC and processing large numbers of rows |