| From: | Alan Cox <alan(at)lxorguk(dot)ukuu(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
| Cc: | jamie <jamiemcc(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk>, Paolo Maggi <paolo(dot)maggi(at)polito(dot)it>, "Gustavo J(dot) A(dot) M(dot) Carneiro" <gjc(at)inescporto(dot)pt>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list(at)gnome(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: dbus and GNOME 2.8 |
| Date: | 2004-04-05 21:36:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1081200983.17422.2.camel@hraefn.swansea.linux.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Llu, 2004-04-05 at 18:59, Markus Bertheau wrote
> PostgreSQL is not resource hungry:
Its not exactly "lightweight" either.
You are having the wrong argument. If the gconf internals are rich
enough in 2.8 then you can sqlite, ldap, webdav, whatever to carry your
data around with you.
There isn't a 'wrong' storage answer once you have the abstractions.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-04-05 21:45:31 | Re: Some news from Turkey |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-04-05 21:13:01 | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |