Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Date: 2004-03-11 21:39:30
Message-ID: 1079041169.86715.113.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> are we just
> pretending to set the level in 7.5 but still using the next level higher?

I believe Peter found verbiage in the spec that said to do exactly that.
Something about the isolation level being the minimum requirement, and
better than that was acceptable.

--
Rod Taylor <rbt [at] rbt [dot] ca>

Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/signature.asc

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-03-11 22:01:39 Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-11 21:38:03 Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2