Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement
Date: 2004-02-21 02:29:38
Message-ID: 1077330578.25444.407.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 20:52, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > Most conspicuously, MySQL is most likely an imitator of Sybase
> > (progenitor of the code that Microsoft sells) in having
> > "autoincrementing columns" as compared to PostgreSQL's notion of
> > "sequence objects."
>
> Nope. AUTO_INCREMENT is in the SQL 99 spec. It's actually well-supported
> in the industry. Eventually we'll probably come up with a command to
> emulate it using sequences so that we can have the SQL-compliance points.

Are you sure about that? A search for AUTO_INCREMENT doesn't give me
anything.

The DB2 style sequence GENERATORs are a part of the 2002 draft.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-02-21 02:31:21 Re: Question
Previous Message David Costa 2004-02-21 02:01:16 Re: Question