Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now
Date: 2001-01-05 19:14:29
Message-ID: 10742.978722069@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> writes:
> Tom, I'm not sure how (or whether) this relates to "alter table" happening
> when someone else is doing a SELECT from table.

The ALTER will wait for the SELECT to finish.  That's not related to the
internal cache problem that I was worried about.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ian Lance TaylorDate: 2001-01-05 19:39:16
Subject: Recursion and SPI
Previous:From: Alex PilosovDate: 2001-01-05 19:13:26
Subject: Re: Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval problems now

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group