Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> writes:
> It would have saved a lot of trouble if it just complained about that
> union thing right away and refuse to create the rule...
That's what happens in CVS tip.
> On a different note, I think there *is* a way to add a where clause to
> the union - that's exactly what I did in that last example - by
> converting it into a subselect...
> Can that not be done automatically for conditional rules?
Send a patch... or at least convince us it can be done ... I'm not
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Wehrle, Daniel||Date: 2003-07-16 07:37:48|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump -t option doesn't take schema-qualified table |
|Previous:||From: Dmitry Tkach||Date: 2003-07-15 21:53:13|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] INSTEAD rule bug?|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2003-07-16 05:26:20|
|Subject: Re: perfromance impact of vacuum|
|Previous:||From: Litel Wang||Date: 2003-07-16 02:51:30|
|Subject: why can't I find the other schemas in my restored database except public schemas ?|