Re: website doc search is extremely SLOW

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "D(dot) Dante Lorenso" <dante(at)lorenso(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: website doc search is extremely SLOW
Date: 2004-01-01 01:48:47
Message-ID: 1072921727.1662.18.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 18:43, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Why are we not using Tsearch2?
> >
> > Because nobody has built it yet? Oleg's stuff is nice, but we want
> > something that we can build into the existing web sites, not a standalone
> > site ...
> >
> > I keep searching the web hoping someone has come up with a 'tsearch2'
> > based search engine that does the spidering, but, unless its sitting right
> > in front of my eyes and I'm not seeing it, I haven't found it yet :(
> >
> > Out of everything I've found so far, mnogosearch is one of the best ... I
> > just wish I could figure out where the bottleneck for it was, since, from
> > reading their docs, their method of storing the data doesn't appear to be
> > particularly off. I'm tempted to try their caching storage manager, and
> > getting away from SQL totally, but I *really* want to showcase PostgreSQL
> > on this :(
>
> Well, PostgreSQL is being un-showcased in the current setup, that's for
> sure. :-(
In fact this is a very bad advertisement for postgres

--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 1467551

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-01-01 01:49:34 Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... )
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2004-01-01 01:41:56 Re: measuring disk usage of records