Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Warp

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,Eric Caloone <eric(dot)caloone(at)free(dot)fr>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Warp
Date: 2005-01-09 22:02:33
Message-ID: 1070.1105308153@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.

> I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
> our CVS source but only with modified source.

We don't have a Novell port --- it is not, and should not be, listed as
a "supported platform" if it requires hacking the source.

There may be a Novell port out there, but I don't take any
responsibility for it ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: Warp at 2005-01-09 21:59:20 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: Warp at 2005-01-09 22:05:37 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-09 22:05:37
Subject: Re: Warp
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-09 21:59:20
Subject: Re: Warp

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group