Re: PostgreSQL is much faster than MySQL, only when...

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Marek Lewczuk <newsy(at)lewczuk(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL is much faster than MySQL, only when...
Date: 2003-11-25 21:26:20
Message-ID: 1069795580.21305.554.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 08:07, Marek Lewczuk wrote:
> Użytkownik terry(at)greatgulfhomes(dot)com napisał:
>
> > You said:
> > "When I have run my application on PostgreSQL it was disaster"
> >
> > I think you meant:
> > "When I have run my application on MySQL it was disaster"
>
> Well, my english isn't perfect or it was simple mistake... but what I
> wanted to say is that my application wasn't working well with PostgreSQL
> before the db structure has been changed (new indexes). After that it
> was much better...
>

Yes. I think the gist of your post was "out of the box postgresql
performed like garbage compared to mysql, but then i spent some time
tweaking and tuning, taking advantage of indexes, and now it performs so
quickly that i am unable to make any changes within mysql to match
postgresql's performance"

I'm curious as to what type of application you run and what first
prompted you to switch to postgresql?

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-25 21:44:39 Re: Anyone know gForge?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-25 21:04:14 Re: [HACKERS] Commercial binary support?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremiah Jahn 2003-11-25 21:55:38 Re: Large objects [BLOB] again - general howto
Previous Message Dean Grubb 2003-11-25 21:15:11 Re: Help, Australian Time Problem