| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Philip Crotwell" <crotwell(at)seis(dot)sc(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2356: sqrt and cbrt return different types |
| Date: | 2006-03-24 21:35:52 |
| Message-ID: | 10690.1143236152@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Philip Crotwell" <crotwell(at)seis(dot)sc(dot)edu> writes:
> It seems to me that square root and cube root should be the same in return
> type.
They are, or at least one form of them matches:
regression=# \df sqrt
List of functions
Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
------------+------+------------------+---------------------
pg_catalog | sqrt | double precision | double precision
pg_catalog | sqrt | numeric | numeric
(2 rows)
regression=# \df cbrt
List of functions
Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
------------+------+------------------+---------------------
pg_catalog | cbrt | double precision | double precision
(1 row)
I think your request really amounts to "we should require every numeric
function to have a float8 counterpart and vice versa". Life's a bit too
short for that, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-24 21:39:20 | Re: BUG #2357: docs for mod() are wrong |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-03-24 21:35:39 | Re: Error in ecpg |