Christopher Browne kirjutas E, 03.11.2003 kell 02:15:
> Well, actually, the case where it _would_ be troublesome would be
> where there was a combination of huge tables needing vacuuming and
> smaller ones that are _heavily_ updated (e.g. - account balances),
> where pg_autovacuum might take so long on some big tables that it
> wouldn't get to the smaller ones often enough.  

Can't one just run a _separate_ VACUUM on those smaller tables ?

------------
Hannu

In response to

• Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM at 2003-11-03 00:15:07 from Christopher Browne

Responses

• Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM at 2003-11-03 13:22:45 from Christopher Browne

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Hannu Krosing	Date: 2003-11-03 09:21:36
	Subject: Re: adding support for posix_fadvise()
Previous:	From: Larry Rosenman	Date: 2003-11-03 06:37:28
	Subject: Re: Port Report: UnixWare