| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Press Release |
| Date: | 2003-10-30 00:38:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1067474328.8672.48.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:08, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >Nowhere do I read unmonitored 24/7/365 availability or ultra-fast always
> >peak speed availability. 7.4 may have it's speed bumps but it will be
> >responding to queries.
> >
> >
> Not if it is a vacuum full and you are trying to do an insert. Which is
> exactly what
Why are you running a vacuum full -- forgot to do a regular vacuum often
enough? PostgreSQL also won't be answering queries if I unplug the
machine it is on, toss it into the back of a plane and fly it to another
data centre.
We should only be considering standard operation.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-10-30 00:53:57 | Re: Press Release |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-30 00:37:40 | Re: Press Release |