On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 22:49, Greg Stark wrote:
> What version of postgres is this?. In 7.4 (and maybe 7.3?) count() uses an
> int8 to store its count so it's not limited to 4 billion records.
> Unfortunately int8 is somewhat inefficient as it has to be dynamically
> allocated repeatedly.
Uh, what? Why would an int8 need to be "dynamically allocated
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Vivek Khera||Date: 2003-10-27 16:03:35|
|Subject: Re: My own performance/tuning q&a|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2003-10-27 15:34:53|
|Subject: Re: Various performance questions|