| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |
| Date: | 2003-10-14 20:38:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1066163897.28999.11.camel@tokyo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 16:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The last time I did some testing, the builtin memset() was significantly
> faster on plenty of different platforms.
Oh? Which platforms are you referring to, and what tests were performed?
You can find the benchmark results I'm referring to in the archives
here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-08/msg02116.php
(In some hypothetical world in which MemSet() didn't offer a significant
performance improvement, there is no reason to keep it around.)
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-14 20:41:41 | Re: [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery! |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-10-14 20:32:59 | Re: postgres --help-config |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-14 20:43:05 | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |
| Previous Message | Manfred Spraul | 2003-10-14 20:32:56 | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |