Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: posix_fadvise v22

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22
Date: 2009-01-01 20:55:15
Message-ID: 10658.1230843315@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Am I correct in thinking that the only thing we're really checking for
> here is whether a trivial posix_fadvise() call returns success?  If
> so, is this test really worth doing?

Runtime tests performed during configure are generally a bad idea to
start with --- it's impossible to do any such thing in a
cross-compilation scenario, for example.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martin PihlakDate: 2009-01-01 21:10:38
Subject: Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-01-01 20:30:26
Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group