| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, mlg3 <mlg3(at)mail15(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL contribution guidelines? |
| Date: | 2003-09-25 20:14:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1064520876.17819.2182.camel@camel |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 13:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On 25 Sep 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> > > oh.. and i'm not forgetting plphp, but it has both licensing issues and
> > > isn't ready for prime time.
> >
> > I thought there weren't any license issues, except mayhaps with the name.
> >
> > http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
>
> That is what I thought too. Originally PlPHP was stated as being
> released as GPL (which the author thought was used by PHP), but later
> corrected to be the BSD license.
>
The naming issue was the one that had stuck in my head.
(Noting that it isn't BSD licensed, it's PHP licensed, which might be a
problem for some, but seems fairly BSD compatible).
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-25 23:15:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes |
| Previous Message | Keith Bottner | 2003-09-25 20:03:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes |