| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.2.3? |
| Date: | 2002-09-29 14:28:50 |
| Message-ID: | 10628.1033309730@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> The initial Postgres design had a notion of StorageManager's, which
> should make this very easy indeed, if it had been kept working .
But the storage manager interface was never built to hide issues like
tuple representation --- storage managers just deal in raw pages.
I doubt it would have helped in the least for anything we've been
concerned about.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-29 14:57:38 | Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-29 13:38:27 | Re: making use of large TLB pages |