Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data
Date: 2004-02-25 03:35:04
Message-ID: 106.1077680104@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> anyarray has been defined this way since 7.3 -- any concerns there?

I don't think so --- we weren't trying to use it as an actual column
datatype back then.

7.4 has a problem though :-( ... this is one of the "damn I wish we'd
caught that before release" ones, since it can't easily be fixed without
initdb.  Reminds me that I need to get to work on making pg_upgrade
viable again.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-25 04:07:15
Subject: Re: bgwriter never dies
Previous:From: Dann CorbitDate: 2004-02-25 00:50:23
Subject: Re: Is indexing broken for bigint columns?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-02-25 04:07:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] select statement against pg_stats returns
Previous:From: Jeff HolleDate: 2004-02-25 02:36:49
Subject: Re: System tuning

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group