Re: hardware performance and some more

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hardware performance and some more
Date: 2003-07-24 20:09:14
Message-ID: 1059077354.23571.66.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 13:25, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2003 17:08 EEST you wrote:
>
> > On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
[snip]
>
> we do not have memory problem or disk problems. as I have seen in the list the best way to
> use disks are using raid 10 for data and raid 1 for os. we can put as much memory as
> we require.
>
> now the question, if we have 100 searches per second and in each search if we need 30 sql
> instruction, what will be the performance of the system in the order of time. Let us say
> we have two machines described aove in a cluster.

That's 3000 sql statements per second, 180 thousand per minute!!!!
What the heck is this database doing!!!!!

A quad-CPU Opteron sure is looking useful right about now... Or
an quad-CPU AlphaServer ES45 running Linux, if 4x Opterons aren't
available.

How complicated are each of these SELECT statements?

--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA |
| |
| "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian |
| because I hate vegetables!" |
| unknown |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2003-07-24 20:13:47 Re: Tuning PostgreSQL
Previous Message Kasim Oztoprak 2003-07-24 19:06:01 Re: hardware performance and some more