Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Finer Extension dependencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Date: 2012-03-29 18:41:30
Message-ID: 10562.1333046490@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> At the very least, I would suggest that feature names are per-extension.

Yeah, I had about come to that conclusion too.  A global namespace for
them would be a mistake given lack of central coordination.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-29 18:48:26
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-29 18:39:04
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group