Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Patric Bechtel <patric(dot)bechtel(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC
Date: 2012-08-30 20:51:02
Message-ID: 1054.1346359862@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:10:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
>> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
>> of the sanity check.  I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
>> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.

> Any status on this?

Shipped in last week's updates.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-08-30 20:51:56
Subject: Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-08-30 20:50:57
Subject: Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group