Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:10:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
>> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
>> of the sanity check. I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
>> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.
> Any status on this?
Shipped in last week's updates.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-08-30 20:51:56|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2012-08-30 20:50:57|
|Subject: Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements|