"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What does this accomplish other than adding syntactic sugar over a
>> feature that really doesn't work well anyway?
> This patch doesn't intend to implement group commit. I've changed the
> meaning of commit_delay, sorry if that confuses.
Ah. The patch was pretty much unintelligible without the discussion
(which got here considerably later :-(). I've still got misgivings
about how safe it really is, but at least this is better than what
commit_delay wishes it could do.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-02-27 04:14:01|
|Subject: Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning |
|Previous:||From: Jeroen T. Vermeulen||Date: 2007-02-27 04:05:45|
|Subject: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Chris Marcellino||Date: 2007-02-27 05:00:09|
|Subject: POSIX shared memory support|
|Previous:||From: John Bartlett||Date: 2007-02-27 03:23:17|