Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey(dot)tenny(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: postgres jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.
Date: 2004-09-18 22:04:44
Message-ID: 10520.1095545084@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey(dot)tenny(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> Are you saying that I will see stale database state at the logical 
> "start" of my transaction from a pooled connection?

> That's a showstopper for sure. If I'm confused please enlighten me.

Apparently you are confused, because the JDBC behavior has always
been like that; it's only the current devel driver that fixes it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: John R PierceDate: 2004-09-18 22:08:53
Subject: Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code.
Previous:From: Jeffrey TennyDate: 2004-09-18 21:59:37
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group