Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Pg_upgrade has the following check to make sure the cluster is safe for
>> What types, other than views, can we skip in this query?
> It's not obvious to me that anything other than a table or index would matter.
You'd better complain about composite types too, since one of them could
be a column in a table. (Unless you want to test to see whether it
actually is stored anywhere, but that seems like way overkill for this.)
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2011-12-07 07:23:32|
|Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-12-07 03:45:20|
|Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation|