Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Date: 2003-04-15 21:35:18
Message-ID: 1050442518.12855.230.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 17:17, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Marc,
>
> > Other then moving techdocs to the postgresql.org VM, there are no plans to
> > actually move it ...

yeah, those are the plans I'm referring to. I recall Justin saying he
wanted to hold off any drastic changes to techdocs until that move had
taken place..

whether it stays in its current incarnation, or moves
> > to bricolage, or moves to ... depends on who feels they are up to stepping
> > into Justin's shoes on that site ...
>
> Did Justin already install Zope on the site? Plone is looking pretty good.
> David says there's no "light" version of Bricolage :-(
>

Zope is installed given zwiki is currently powering the guides section
of the techdocs site. Personally I think plone is overkill for techdocs.
Photo Albums? Polls? Zwiki by itself will give us what we need without
duplicating things that should be done at the other sites.

Robert Treat

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2003-04-15 21:51:00 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Scott Lamb 2003-04-15 21:26:46 Re: Tech Docs and Consultants