Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Date: 2003-04-10 17:15:56
Message-ID: 1049994956.1886.34.camel@fuji.krosing.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Tom Lane kirjutas N, 10.04.2003 kell 19:59:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:

> > Also there should be a way to tell the backend not to send some types of
> > notices/warnings.
> 
> We already have that, see client_min_message_level.

What I would like would be possibility to better support interactive
applications, namely updating progress bar by sending some extra
out-of-band info (expected rows, how much work has backend done, etc) as
notices.

At the same time I would like to not get some warnings. Thus just having
min-level is not good enough.

-----------------
Hannu


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2003-04-10 17:20:04
Subject: Re: ECPG thread-safety
Previous:From: Barry LindDate: 2003-04-10 17:03:09
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2003-04-10 17:20:04
Subject: Re: ECPG thread-safety
Previous:From: Barry LindDate: 2003-04-10 17:03:09
Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group