Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere

From: John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere
Date: 2003-04-01 04:55:17
Message-ID: 1049172917.12899.30.camel@fileserver.mwk.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

This isn't more that a month or two old.
The previous version worried about nested transactions.
I know Bruce has been thinking about that for a while now, so possibly
that was crossed off as 'fixed'. The 7.4 Docs cover the unlimited
precision "NUMERIC" type, so perhaps that also should be crossed off.

The use of 'out' parameters sounds hairy though.

Regards

john

On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 15:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> > For those interested in porting from Oracle to PG, refer
> > http://www.compiere.org/technology/pg/index.html
>
> I can't see any indication of the date this was written --- but I get
> the feeling it dates back a bit. At least some of the issues mentioned
> have been solved in recent PG releases.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-01 05:13:44 Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-01 03:48:51 Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere