Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: anoncvs still slow

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Subject: Re: anoncvs still slow
Date: 2006-05-27 20:45:27
Message-ID: 10488.1148762727@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> anoncvs (svr4, 66.98.251.159) is still slow responding to "cvs update";
> it's been spotty for about a week now.  Tcpdump shows connections being
> established but then long delays for ACKs, sometimes long enough for cvs
> to time out.  Any updates on what's going on?

Magnus apparently knows what the problem is:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg01002.php
but I haven't seen any of the "other mails" he mentioned.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-27 20:53:29
Subject: Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t?
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2006-05-27 20:37:35
Subject: Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group