bug with vacuum analyze?

From: "Trever L(dot) Adams" <tadams-lists(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: bug with vacuum analyze?
Date: 2003-03-07 18:56:28
Message-ID: 1047063388.1075.18.camel@aurora.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

I believe I have found a bug in the vacuum procedures. I am helping out
a friend who is running a "alumni" sites of sorts using postgresql 7.2.3
as the backend. The first page someone loads does most of the queries
that any page will need and stores it in a session file (php style) and
hands a cookie to the user.

If I never do a vacuum analyze, it takes between 8-11 (high spikes
around 23) seconds most of the time for this first page to load. If I
do vacuum, nothing seems to change. If I do a vacuum analyze, the
minimum load time is between 41-44 seconds. Higher system loads,
instead of adding 4-10 seconds, easily double the number up beyond 80
seconds. Yes, each of these tables have at least one index (the most
indexes I believe are 4). Those with multiple, I believe, all have a
primary index key.

Effects of vacuum full and vacuum freeze haven't been tested. The only
way to recover from these horrible times seems dump/drop/reload.

Is this a bug, known or otherwise, are their workarounds besides don't
do it?

Thank you,
Trever Adams

P.S. This is a RedHat 8.0 box with all errata fixes. Specifics can be
provided later if needed.
--
"Perilous to all of us are the devices of an art deeper than we possess
ourselves." -- Gandalf the White [J.R.R. Tolkien, "The Two Towers", Bk
3, Ch. XI]

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurent FAILLIE 2003-03-07 22:05:31 Re: Solution for bug #899
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-07 17:33:55 Re: Solution for bug #899