Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 04:09:23
Message-ID: 104600000.1063339763@lerlaptop.lerctr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> 
wrote:

> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>> I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.
>
> Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add*
> an implicit #define of __i386__ should be plenty easy compared
> to getting them to *remove* the one for i386.  And while I think
> they should remove the latter, the immediate problem would be
> solved as soon as they add the former.
sure, and I expect that's what they may do.  We'll see what they say.

LER

>
> 			regards, tom lane



-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-09-12 04:09:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-09-12 04:07:14
Subject: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-09-12 04:09:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-09-12 04:07:14
Subject: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group