Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch needed fot dt.h

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org (Michael Meskes)
Subject: Re: Patch needed fot dt.h
Date: 2007-05-21 14:17:30
Message-ID: 10457.1179757050@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> writes:
> With latest modification on src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/dt_common.c, 
> DTK_ISODOW is not defined. The patch attached needs to be applied on 8.1 
> and 8.2 branches to compile successfully.

I'm wondering why the back-branch patches added a dependency on
DTK_ISODOW in the first place.  That looks more like a copy&paste
error than something intentional.  Michael?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-05-21 14:21:33
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-05-21 14:03:02
Subject: Re: Synchronized Scan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group